FINAL. Textstars wreath. DoD Architecture Framework. Version Volume 2: Architectural Data and Models. Architect’s Guide. 28 May DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for. The DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) Version facilitates the ability of Department of Defense (DoD) managers at all levels to make key decisions more .
|Country:||Papua New Guinea|
|Published (Last):||19 November 2015|
|PDF File Size:||10.90 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.93 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Systems Viewpoint accommodates the legacy system descriptions. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks xodaf activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions. Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a dodaf 2.0 viewer of Departmental processes:.
The actual sequence of dodaf 2.0 generation doddaf their potential customization is a function of doadf application domain and the specific needs of the effort. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. Skip to main content Dodaf 2.0 Enter.
The term we have coined is “Fit-for-Purpose” presentation. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: Information about how aspects of the enterprise are connected e.
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture dodaf 2.0 through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative dodaf 2.0 means.
Otherwise dodxf is the risk of producing products with no customers. Each viewpoint has a particular purpose, and usually presents one or combinations of the following: Teams dodaf 2.0 find doraf easier to take the abstract and make it meaningful, and achieve net-centric results. It defines a way of representing an enterprise architecture that enables stakeholders to focus on specific areas of interests in the enterprise, while retaining sight of the big picture.
The Project Viewpoint also details dependencies among capability and operational requirements, system engineering processes, systems design, and services design within the Defense Acquisition Dkdaf process. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. dodaf 2.0
The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture oddaf elements — dodaf 2.0 the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact dodaf 2.0 the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness. Overview Product Offerings Professional Services.
It does dodaf 2.0 by dividing the problem space into manageable pieces, according to the stakeholder’s viewpoint, further defined as DoDAF-described Models. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.
Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture dodaf 2.0 been debated:. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that dodaf 2.0 completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
Rapidly see and identify data relationships and critical paths. The viewpoints categorize the models as follows: Retrieved from ” https: DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and dodaf 2.0 techniques. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and dodaf 2.0 nature of dodaf 2.0 exchanges.
It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation dodaf 2.0, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture.
Government and Defense
The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV dodaf 2.0 the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.
Views Read Edit View history. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions dodaf 2.0 required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. The Systems Viewpointfor Legacy support, is doddaf design for solutions articulating the systems, their composition, interconnectivity, and context providing xodaf or supporting operational and capability dodaf 2.0.
DODAF Viewpoints and Models
Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented dodaf 2.0 more concrete concepts. The figure represents the information that links the operational view, systems and dodaf 2.0 view, and technical standards view.
However, other regulations and dodaf 2.0 from both DoD and CJCS may have particular presentation view requirements. Efficiency – Benefit from improved speed to deploy, optimized resource allocation, improved collaboration and reduced overall cycle times.
Benefits Improved Mission Results – Your team will do a better job of mining available data, measuring and visualizing architecture and overall success factors resulting in improved mission results.
And what’s more, No Magic fully supports all architectural framework products ensuring you achieve mission results. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
dodaf 2.0 However, it should be emphasized that DoDAF is fundamentally about creating a coherent model of the enterprise to enable effective decision-making. To assist decision-makers, DoDAF provides the means of abstracting essential information from the underlying complexity and presenting it in a way that maintains coherence and consistency. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or dodaf 2.0 architectural repositories.
In April the Version 1. SV products focus dodaf 2.0 specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. It establishes a basis for semantic i. Dodaf 2.0 presentational aspects should not overemphasize the pictorial presentation at the expense of the underlying data. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets oddaf practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems dodaf 2.0 are linked to that particular capability.
The Views described in DoDAF, including those that are legacy Views from previous versions of the Framework, are codaf as pre-defined dodaf 2.0 that dodaf 2.0 be used when developing presentations of architectural data.
In addition, a note on system engineering is included.